Synagogue collapse Update: TB Joshua Faces Coroner

The Fireman “Expert” who testified in Court:

Anyone with even the least understanding, looking at the way the SCOAN building collapse can tell that the collapse was near-symmetrical, quick and total. An indisputable fact is that no other theory would suffice to explain such a near-symmetrical, rapid and total collapse but that of carefully placed explosives set off in a particular order. In the last post we made reference to an article containing the confirmatory proofs of controlled demolition. But of the countless reports on line and in-print on the synagogue catastrophe, none and I repeat, absolutely none has managed to prove or even “suggest reasonably” how possible it is for “structural failure” to cause a total and symmetrical collapse of a high-rise building.

A fireman who spoke as a witness in the inquest was quoted to have said, he perceived no smell of explosives around the building or the evidence of a fire and so debunks the theory of a controlled demolition; Yet the fireman did not state in the hearing of the court the confirmatory signs that a building collapse was induced by controlled demolition, neither did he tell the court how to know if a building collapsed due to structural failure. He was trying to defeat an idea without propounding another – placing something on nothing and expecting it to stand. Who would blame him? after all he most likely has never in his life witnessed a controlled demolition, nor has studied anything about it. He spoke based on his limited understanding and went too far in the way he premised his conclusion merely because he saw no fire, and could not smell any explosive: both of which are not foolproof characteristics of a structural failure anywhere in the world.


On summoning TB Joshua to Court

There is already so much fuss about TB Joshua appearing in at the court of inquiry into the building collapse, having been summoned by the coroner of inquest himself. Whilst this may not in the opinion of lovers of TB Joshua and SCOAN to be proper, it is in any case going to happen and there is really nothing anyone can do about it at this point. What is worthy of note is the way the prophet’s appearance at the inquiry is so heavily and eagerly anticipated. He seemed to have been summoned in the way an ordinary witness would have been summoned, but it couldn’t be made anymore obvious that TB Joshua is no ordinary witness. His reputation precedes him. The first question that might come to the mind of SCOAN faithfuls on hearing this could be; who do they really want to testify at this inquest, MR. TB JOSHUA or PROPHET TB JOSHUA?. That seems to be a question for the coroner himself to decide.

While we may not be comfortable with the way TBJ has been summoned to court, it couldn’t have been the case if God had not allowed it. We should therefore submit to the will of God in this matter. The prophet has earlier said to us, No one can help me; only God; Leave me with God. We cannot love the prophet more than the God who called him, without whose will and purpose this could not have happened. fear not, the very hairs of the prophet’s head are numbered.

For a prophet who once could endure being unjustly detained in a cell for thirteen days, a court summon is very well within his tolerance.


Lost Voices of the Martyrs

In every generation, there is a peculiar tribulation for the believers in Christ’s to endure as is allowed by God; in the days of the holy apostles, it was persecution from city to city. Now that Christianity as a religion has become so widespread and appealing to the extent that people who are not Christians are claiming to be, the persecution definitely has taken another form. That of concerted attacks, campaign of calumny, intimidation and slanderous remarks. But one thing that is common to all the forms of persecution throughout the ages is the hatred of men towards the servants of God and apostles of Jesus Christ. Now is the time for us to remember the Lord’s words: Jesus said: you who stone the prophets and kill those who are sent to you.  Also to his disciples he said: All men will hate you because of me. It has become so pronounced for us according to what Jesus foretold; because  those who hate us and kill us think that they do God a service. John 16:2.

With the situation of the building collapse and the recent summoning of the Prophet to the court, one can understand a little of how the early church felt when the apostles were always dragged before Kings and rulers on account of the doctrine of the gospel. They were constantly summoned, queried, judged wrongly, sentenced to harsh judgments surpassing those of convicted criminals, and endured sufferings of all kinds which finally culminated in martyrdom. This was all required for the crown of righteousness Tasting of the cup of suffering of the Lord that we may also reign with him. Let us remember the faith of the Holy Apostles which they committed unto us with the seal of their blood; through which today we couldn’t have been saved. This is what the prophet meant when he spoke of martyrs being a blessing to us and to the whole world. Apostle Paul emphatically stated that “We must go through many hardships to enter the kingdom of God,” Acts 14:22. These temporary tribulations are not to be feared, but it is to be feared that which has no end, the weeping and lamentations that never cease, finding no repose and consolation from tortures at any time forever – this which the blasphemers, slanderers and critic bloggers are not afraid to suffer.


scoan building collapse

TEN Evidence materials’ on the Synagogue Collapse site

In this open letter addressed to the coroner of Inquest on the synagogue building collapse, by a Nigerian journalist, the facts of the building collapse are thoroughly explained. The writer with solid evidence meticulously states ten undeniable proofs for the collapse being a preplanned demolition, for Coroner O.A KOMOLAFE’s attention.


Dear Coroner,

I write this ‘open letter’ for your perusal having good hope in your impartial contemplation; emboldened because your good office afforded opportunity to members of the public with evidence material that will assist the court in its findings to indicate their interest.

Since the incident occurred at the SCOAN premises, online and print media have been awash with volumes of editorials on the catastrophe. The sordid fact about these reports is that most have turned out to be greatly misleading. They seem to be exploiting the tragedy for further barrage of criticism meant to destroy the SCOAN – criticisms that have trailed Joshua since the eighties.

It is a disastrous event and even as the whole nation mourns with the SCOAN, it should be evident that Joshua is the Chief mourner. No one should be permitted to cry more than the bereaved; or make frantic efforts to contort people’s perception from actuality to imagination, as much of the media have done in the past weeks. It is agonizing to watch how from their untruths, joined one to the other, the erroneous inference surfaced that the collapse of the building resulted from a ‘structural failure’ of the building. These are still being purported despite the CCTV videos put forth by The SCOAN to reveal what actually happened to the building. In wake of these events, I, having thoroughly studied the released CCTV videos and available survivor accounts, forthwith cite TEN REASONS why the collapse of the SCOAN building was definitely preplanned and effected by ‘controlled demolition’.

1. NO ABSOLUTE COLLAPSE BY STRUCTURAL FAILURE: The ‘structural failure’ collapse theory on the synagogue building collapse is first rendered implausible by one major problem. The simple fact that ‘structural failure’ has never — prior to or after 9/12, caused a consequent complete, rapid and symmetrical collapse of buildings. Defenders of the ‘structural failure’ theory seldom, if ever mention this simple fact. There is also a reverse truth to this fact, that aside from the alleged case of 9/12, structural failure has never caused large storey buildings to utterly collapse like a pack of cards. The reverse truth is that every previous absolute collapse has been caused by the procedure known as ‘controlled demolition, in which explosives capable of cutting steel have been placed in crucial places throughout the building and then set off in a particular order. To see how ludicrous the claim is that the collapse of the synagogue building was induced by structural failure, here are other facts typical of controlled demolition.

2. SUDDEN ONSET: in controlled demolition, the onset of the collapse is sudden, one moment, the building is perfectly motionless, the next moment it suddenly begins to collapse. But buildings even when overweighed do not suddenly buckle or break. So in a structural failure caused collapse, if we had any examples of such, the onset would be gradual. It would begin by tilting to one side or by showing Cracks and fissures in the building when subjected to overwhelming live and dead weight; but there were no signs of tilting to any side or cracking or breakage. No pillar was broken off. The building was perfectly motionless up to the moment it began to collapse.

3. STRAIGHT DOWN: The most important thing in a controlled demolition of a tall building close to other buildings is that it comes straight down, into, or at least close to its own footprint, so that it does not harm other buildings. A phenomenon which a building expert calls ‘falling inwardly’. The whole art or science of controlled demolition is oriented primarily around this goal. As Mark Loizeaux, the president of controlled demolition. Inc. has explained, “To bring [a building] down as we want, so …. no other structure is harmed,” the demolition must be completely planned,” using “the right explosive [and] the right pattern of laying the charges.” (Else 2004) if the six storey building had fallen over, it would have caused enormous amount of damage to the smaller structures around the building. According to what is alleged by many critics, accepting that ‘structural failure’ produces collapses that perfectly mimicked the collapses that have otherwise been produced only by precisely placed explosives, is verging on insane.

4. ALMOST FREE-FALL SPEED: Buildings brought down by controlled demolition collapse at almost free-fall speed. This occurs because the supports for the lower floors are destroyed so that when the upper floors come down, they encounter no resistance. The fact that the collapse of the synagogue building mimicked this feature of controlled demolition is seen in the CCTV video released by the SCOAN. The building collapsed in approximately 4 seconds. If the building had collapsed through a structural failure, the lower floors with all their steel and concrete would have provided some resistance. The upper floors could not have fallen through them at the same speed as they would fall through the air. Accepting that this building collapsed due to structural failure is accepting a charade, because every floor of every storey, fell as though nothing existed below it but air. The storey’s must all have been falling simultaneously to reach the ground in such short amount of time. This highlights a feature in the method known as controlled demolition. Each floor of a building is destroyed at just the moment the floor above it is about to strike it, thus the floors fall simultaneously, and in virtual free-fall. Only well placed explosives can do this. This is what happens in controlled demolition.

5. TOTAL COLLAPSE: The alleged ‘structural failure’ collapse theory is even more decisively ruled out by the fact that the collapse was total. The large six-storey building collapsed into piles of rubble lesser than the height of the ground floor. How was that possible? There is no way a structural failure could cause a global that is total collapse at virtually free-fall speed. Some walls should most certainly have remained standing, even earthquakes, which have produced some partial collapses, have never produced total collapses. As is seen in the photo; each floor of the storey- building in the rubble was seen piled one upon the other like slices of bread. ​

6. SLICED STEEL: In controlled demolitions of high-rise buildings, explosives are used to slice the steel columns and beams into pieces. A representative of controlled Demolition. Inc. has said of RDX, one of the commonly used high explosives, that it slices steel like a “razor blade through a tomato”. The steel is, moreover, not merely sliced: it is sliced into manageable lengths. As Controlled Demolition, Inc., says in its publicity: “Our DREXSTM systems… segment steel into pieces matching the lifting capacity of the available equipment.” The collapse of the synagogue building, it seems, somehow managed to mimic this feature of controlled demolitions as well. Studying the building collapse site reveals that much of the steel has been chopped up into sections that can easily be loaded onto the equipment’s that were cleaning up the rubble.

7. PULVERIZATION OF CONCRETE AND OTHER MATERIALS: Another feature of controlled demolition is the production of A LOT OF DUST, because explosives powerful enough to cut steel columns will pulverize concrete and most other metallic and non-metallic substances into tiny particles. The CCTV video of camera 6 reveal so much dust emanating from the building sides due to the implosion. Observations at the collapse site also reveal that there was nowhere near enough rubble to account for the entire six-storey building; No single concrete block remained upon another; not even one electrical appliance like an air conditioner or refrigerator could be recovered from the building. How on earth can this happen through structural failure? The only explanation for this occurrence is the fact that most metallic constituents of the six-storey building together with the concrete were pulverized into fine powder. This fact creates a problem for the theory of ‘structural failure’ collapse, whose only available energy was gravitational energy. This energy would have been sufficient to break some of the concrete into fairly small pieces, but it would not have been anywhere close to the amount of energy needed to turn the concrete and virtually all the metallic contents of the building into tiny particles of dust.

8. DUST CLOUDS: Yet another common feature of controlled demolition is the production of dust cloud. Incredible amounts of dust and smoke result when explosions eject concrete dust from the building with great energy. And as one can see by comparing videos on the web, the collapse of the synagogue six-storey guest house produced clouds that are very similar to those produced by controlled demolitions of other structures. The question of the source of the needed energy again rises, which by far exceeded the gravitational energy available. Besides the sheer quantity of energy needed, another problem with the ‘structural failure’ collapse theory is that gravitational energy is wholly unsuited to explain the production of these dust clouds. This is most obviously the case in the first few seconds. You can see thick clouds of pulverized concrete being ejected within the first two seconds. That’s when the relative motion of the top of the building to the intact portion was only a few feet per seconds. A great amount of very fine concrete dust is ejected from the base of the building very early in the collapse when concrete slabs would only have been bumping into each other. A Zambian, Melvin Bwalya, who was standing very close to the building when it fatally caved in said to the Zambian newspaper: the church that “…I collapsed and fell a few meters away from the building where I was buried in A HEAP OF DUST.”

9. HORIZONTAL EJECTIONS: Another common feature of controlled demolition is the horizontal ejection of other materials, besides dust, from those areas of the building in which explosives were set off. In the case of the synagogue building, the CCTV Video from camera 6 reveal that large blocks of concrete and heavy pieces of steel were ejected from the areas of the building in which explosives were set off to great distances from the building. But gravitational energy is, of course, vertical, so a collapse by structural failure cannot even begin to explain these horizontal ejections.

10. SOUNDS PRODUCED BY EXPLOSIONS: Still another common feature of collapse induced by explosion’s are sounds and demolition rings, in which a series of small explosions run rapidly around a building. This feature was also manifested by the collapse of the synagogue guest house. Like all the previous features except the cutting of the steel columns inside the building. This one could be observed by witnesses. And as we have seen in the reports, there is abundant testimony to the existence of such sounds before and during the collapse of the synagogue building. A fact which was confirmed by a survivor of the incident. khathuathelo Ramovha speaking to the BBC expressed how He heard a very small sound shiiiiii….shiiiiii….shiiiiii – something like a wired bomb that had to run that wire before it could reach were the bomb is – rrrrrrrrrrrr…….grrrrrrrrrrrr so quick and wha… the building came down…..” A 39 years old Zambian businessman, Melvin Bwalya, was standing very close to the building when it fatally caved in. Speaking to Zambian Christian newspaper, ‘The Church’, also explained: “I JUST HEARD A HUGE BANG. I don’t remember anything from that moment because I am told I fainted.”

OTHER SUSPICOUS FACTS:

(a) Although we have already considered sufficient evidence for the theory that the building was being brought down by explosives, there is still more. Before the collapse of the building, it was recorded that at least four times, there was a crossing of a military airplane which appears to be a Hercules C-130 – a military aircraft, not civil. It remains a disturbing mystery, why and for what purpose a fighter plane was doing at midday over a residential area that many times (at least 4 times as the CCTV Camera shows) and, most especially, at close proximity over the synagogue building. It seems entirely bizarre, unserviceable and, therefore, entirely suspect.

(b) Finally, the date of the collapse of the building (September 12) refers by inference to a similar collapse of the towers of the World Trade Center of the United States on September 11, in the USA. It is therefore a logical connection of similar terrorism on The Synagogue Church of All Nations, led by Prophet T.B. Joshua.

Conclusion:

It is, in any case, already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the collapse of the synagogue guest house was done by controlled demolition; orchestrated by high level terrorists. Domestic terrorists like Boko haram in Nigeria could not have gotten access to the buildings to plant the explosives. They probably would not have had the courtesy to make sure that the building collapsed straight down, rather than falling over onto surrounding buildings. In the light of this situation and the facts discussed in this essay.

I do therefore request your good office, and the Government of Nigeria to take the Lead in finally exposing to the world the truth about how the synagogue building collapsed.

Ref: 9/11 attack on WTC controlled demolition of high rise building; implosionworld.com; Demolition Inc.


Stanley Oghogho – freelance Nigerian Journalist.

source: http://www.thenigerianvoice.com/news/159383/1/open-letter-to-coroner-oa-komolafe-coroners-inques.html

NIGERIA’S ‘9/12’: BURIED FACTS ON THE SYNAGOGUE BUILDING COLLAPSE

Having read through most propaganda of TB Joshua haters online – the allegations of the people coming out of their woodwork with nooses and stakes crying prosecute Him, prosecute Him, at the top of their voices. Here are some thoughts on this new video for anyone who cares to be objective enough.

Watching the new CCTV video from TB Joshua on the synagogue building catastrophe really puts the tragedy in perspective for those who are not already impervious to the truth. The pressure fumes emanating from the sides of the building just seconds before its eventual dissolve shows that something most certainly exploded from within the building with excessive force. The fumes literally gushed out of the sides of the building with so much pressure that confirms the preceding effect of powerful explosives. The pressure fumes gushed out with such high velocity that they overtook a man hastily fleeing away from the disaster; though the man was already at a considerable distance from the building before the incident.

More so, if you watch the moment of the incident closely to the right of the screen, you can observe large concrete blocks literally flung high into the air at a far distance from the building; traveling in a parabolic path whilst in projectile motion. This confirms that the concrete blocks have gained momentum from an energy source (at a point) to be able to fly so high and far away from the building at such velocity. According to newton’s law of motion: A body will remain in its state of rest or uniform motion unless it is acted upon by a force. Thus, the forceful projection of those concrete blocks totally reveals they were given an initial velocity by the violent explosions that occurred. This is in stark contrast to critic’s alleged theory of a structural defect caused collapse. The ‘defect caused collapse’ theory would have been irrevocably established if and only if those concrete blocks were falling from rest with an initial velocity of zero – as a type of free fall under gravity.

Even If one were to be super-humanly gracious to these critics, by assuming the worst case scenario that the foundation structure of that building was weak, the truth resurfaces again that it had for long previously supported the building and hence was in some measure solid. Therefore, if their assumptions were in the least correct of it being a collapse due to structural defects, we should have witnessed the exact point where the dead and live weight of the building overwhelmed its allegedly ‘inadequate’ support. This would have been made known by cracks and fissures in the building walls and pillars. Hence, practically speaking, the building would not have collapsed entirely in just four seconds. If critic’s assumption were in the least correct, then, while the tragedy happened, the expected resistance of the allegedly inadequate support would also have been noticed according to newton’s third law which states that to every action there is an equal but opposite reaction. But there was nothing of this but the rapid dissolution of a six storey building in four seconds to an unrecognizable rubble.

In conformity with the above: a building and constructions expert who also attests to have watched several buildings being demolished during the Gautrain, reveals that a building that falls by itself due to a ‘structural defect’ will NOT:

1. Fall down COMPLETELY FLAT; some walls will remain standing.

2. Will NOT fall down INWARDLY; some will fall to the sides.

3. Will NOT fall down at the SPEED this one fell, which was about four seconds.

4. It should start showing CRACKS and FOREWARN that it is about to fall.

Someone on seeing this collapse said it collapsed like sugar crumbling. A South African survivor by name Van Der Byl who lost his wife in the tragedy insists that TB Joshua should not be blamed for the incident. His narration of the events leading to the incident gives further confirmations of the above points. The points gleaned from his statements can be summarized thus:

1. He stated that there was NO WARNING SIGN that such a thing would happen.

2. He affirmed that NONE of the PILLARS had broken off.

3. He stated that The building did not TILT to any SIDE

4. As they were in the dining room on the GROUND FLOOR, he just noticed that the opposite side BROKE OUT.

5. In THREE SECONDS; the whole building crashed on top of them.

6. HE classified the materials being used in the building at TOP QUALITY, including the steel.

Another survivor of the incident khathuathelo Ramovha speaking to the BBC expressed how He heard a very small sound shiiiiii….shiiiiii….shiiiiii – something like a wired bomb that had to run that wire before it could reach were the bomb is – rrrrrrrrrrrr…….grrrrrrrrrrrr so quick and wha… the building came down…..”

From about 00:34 of the video below:

It is very sad that people are feigning blindness to something as glaring as the truth that this is a premeditated and concerted attack on the SCOAN. How can anyone be so blind not to see that the dissolution of a large six storey building to a pile of rubble in just four seconds is not normal? Unfortunately, there as so many of such people, than those who have eyes and can see with them. Even If many people are so blind to these facts, we are glad not the leaders, especially the president of South Africa who is quoted to have said:

“…TB Joshua should be spared criticism for the collapse of a church building which resulted in the deaths of at least 84 South Africans…”The outpouring of criticism is unwarranted and calls for the Public Protector to be deployed to Nigeria are a gross over reaction,” the president said.

With this comment he seems to believe that the building was attacked, but this statement is a safe way of expressing what he believes while simultaneously not appearing to be subservient to TB Joshua’s stand on the issue. Nigeria, your hypocrisy stinks in every corner and alleyway, the manner in which you cry more than the bereaved.

Watch the full video below:

EX-DISCIPLE SOE REFLECTS ON THE SCOAN TRAGEDY

momment of incident

Having read through most propaganda by TB Joshua haters online, and the allegations asserted by the people holding nooses and stakes crying prosecute Him, prosecute Him, at the top of their voices. Here’s a brief comment on this new video for anyone who cares to be objective enough.

Watching the new CCTV video from TB Joshua on the synagogue building catastrophe really puts the tragedy in perspective for those who are not already impervious to the truth. The pressure fumes emanating from the sides of the building just seconds before its eventual dissolve shows that something most certainly exploded from within the building with excessive force. The fumes literarily gushed out of the sides of the building with so much pressure that confirms the preceding effect of powerful explosives. The pressure fumes gushed out with such high velocity that they overtook a man hastily fleeing away from the disaster; though the man was already at a considerable distance from the building before the incident. More so, if you watch the moment of the incident closely to the right of the screen, you can observe large concrete blocks literally flung high into the air at a far distance from the building; travelling in a parabolic path whilst in projectile motion. This confirms that the concrete blocks have gained momentum from an energy source (at a point) to be able to fly so high and far away from the building at such velocity.

According to newton’s law of motion: A body will remain in its state of rest or uniform motion unless it is acted upon by a force. This is in stark contrast to critic’s alleged theory of a structural defect caused collapse. Assuming the worst case scenario that the foundation structure of that building was defective as is widely alleged by critics, the fact remains that it had for a time previously supported the building; and so in some measure solid. Therefore if their assumptions were in the least correct of it being a collapse due to structural defects, we should have witnessed the exact point where the dead and live weight of the building overwhelmed its allegedly ‘inadequate’ support. Hence, practically speaking, it would not have collapsed entirely in just four seconds. If critic’s assumption were in the least correct, then, while the tragedy happened, the expected resistance of the allegedly inadequate support would also have been noticed according to newton’s third law which states that to every action there is an equal but opposite reaction. But there was nothing of this but the rapid dissolution of a six storey building in four seconds to an unrecognizable rubble. It is very sad that people are feigning blindness to something as glaring as the truth that this is a premeditated and concerted attack on the SCOAN. How can anyone be so blind not to see that the dissolution of a large six storey building to a pile of rubble in just four seconds is abnormal for a ‘defect caused’ collapse? Unfortunately, there as so many of such people, than those who have eyes and can see with them. Even If many people are so blind to these facts, we are glad not the leaders, especially the president of South Africa who is quoted to have said:

“…TB Joshua should be spared criticism for the collapse of a church building which resulted in the deaths of at least 84 South Africans…”The outpouring of criticism is unwarranted and calls for the Public Protector to be deployed to Nigeria are a gross over reaction,” the president said.

With this comment he seems to believe that the building was attacked, but this statement is a safe way of expressing what he believes while simultaneously not appearing subservient to TB Joshua’s stand on the issue. Nigeria, your hypocrisy stinks in every corner and alleyway, the manner in which you cry more than the bereaved.

watch the full video below:

 

Hercules-C130-600x450

MYSTERY JET BEHIND THE COLLAPSED BUILDING AT SCOAN: MATTERS ARISING

Hear what TB Joshua’s critics have to say about the tragedy:

 …regardless of what may be said by TB Joshua, it is quite clear to any rationally minded individual that this tragedy was caused by unauthorized and unregulated building work,… the alternative hypothesis presented by TB Joshua is verging on insane.

We all know TB Joshua’s critics would stop at nothing to smear his reputation, they have done well of that profession even without a tragedy like this, so we consider this tragedy a ‘feast’ for their fault-finding brains.  This is not difficult to learn considering the number of articles they have published on the subject – so many that it almost appears they are elated over the tragedy.  In all it is unequivocally clear that TB Joshua’s critic opinion hang on a mere speculation, there are absolutely no verified facts backing their claims. This is not a case at all to be speculated, neither is it a matter of belief. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion but not to their own facts. Before it can be determined who was responsible, it must first be determined what was done and how it was done. The order of solving a crime is to figure:

1 WHAT happened then

2 HOW it happened e.g. what weapon, then

3 WHO did it and only then can we address

4 WHY they did it (motive)

None can convict the SCOAN of anything based on a speculation; how can you convict someone of a crime if you cannot prove the crime to charge them with? If you a going to accuse someone of a murder using a gun, you had better be sure the body has a bullet hole in it and this case of a collapsed building would take some time to fully investigate and ascertain. Yet before evening of the day of the tragedy, TB Joshua’s critics were already blaming TB Joshua for what they dubbed “unauthorized and unregulated building work” Before any investigation had been conducted to even determine what had even been done. So much for being a comprehensive resource. So great is their hate towards TB Joshua that they cannot wait for a conclusive investigation to be reached on the tragedy, waiting 10 days seems like waiting for 100 days when you are itching to accuse. TB Joshua gave a summary of the physical evidence captured by the CCTV camera at His church which a commenter on the TB Joshua critic blog put in these words:

This attack on SCOAN is another proof that Prophet TB Joshua is a real Man of God. I just finished watching the Church CCTV Camera play now in the live service and it has shown that a strange jet hovered the building 4 times before it collapsed. Now also in Nigeria. A Nigerian war jet used to fight Boko Haram Has been Missing since 10:30AM on Friday 12, of September 2014 and Was expected to return back 12 PM Same Day, Now check the time difference and verifying you will know that this was an attack on SCOAN Building.

In a related development, A SCOAN visitor by providence rather than by intent did take photographs of the fighter Jet that hovered over the SCOAN building while taking photographs of the SCOAN buildings for himself – this further lends credence to the CCTV footage of the plane hovering over the building before the incident shown on Emmanuel TV.Strange-Plane-1-600x248

Strange-Plane-2-600x355

What one finds very disturbing is the fact that many TB Joshua’s critics deliberately and fully obscure the occurrence of the strange jet that hovered over the collapsed building in their analysis of this tragedy and rather than call for investigation as to what this fighter jet was doing around the building four times and how it got there and who was manning it, they are busy clamoring for the arrest of TB Joshua. To them, it seems inconsequential to the subject matter that a Nigerian war jet used to fight Boko Haram went missing since 10:30AM on Friday 12, of September 2014 and that on the same day from about 11:43 am, a strange Jet was seen hovering over the SCOAN building four times within very short intervals before its collapse with photography proofs and eye witness accounts both at the Church premises and even without. They would rather hold to the assumption that the military’s jet sudden appearance and the rounds it made over the building was unimportant and would rather maintain that the building was unauthorized so as to make sure TB Joshua is indicted and charged for homicide.

If these people owned a lodging over which a similar thing happened is this the same action they would take? Hypocrites! Why would a ministry as wealthy as the SCOAN use substandard materials in constructing a lodging? Even a die-hard TB Joshua critic on the TBJ critic watch blog after watching the video of the building collapse severally, did support that the collapse looked like a “controlled demolition”

It should be noted that so far TB Joshua’s ministry has done the biggest injury to the Boko haram sect in Nigeria, delivering their members, exposing their secrets publicly and continually challenging their activities with an eye of superiority over them. This may just be their own way of getting back at SCOAN.

The reporting of the Nigerian Television authority, the NTA about this incident has just shown itself to be lopsided journalism. Yesterday, on the 18th of September 2014, by 9:00pm Nigerian time during the network news on the NTA, The channel showed the added clip of the SCOAN visitors comment on the mysterious plane, but much deliberately edited out the first part in which a Visitor took photos of the mystery jet flying so dangerously close to the building. What a Shame! I believe this was the reason the SCOAN members were hostile to them from the beginning, because the smelt a rat in their guts. This is the same Nigerian Television Authority that did not consider it newsworthy that the Late President Omar Bongo of Gabon who was then the longest ruling president in Africa, paid a visit to a Nigerian Prophet, TB Joshua; this is the same Nigerian Television Authority that did not consider it newsworthy that the late Ghanaian President John Evan’s Atta Mills, visited the SCOAN for a thanksgiving. But now a building in The SCOAN collapsed (tragedy) and they were all over the place within minutes of the incident. What a shame!

As for those going on about the building being unauthorized, it should be pointed out that even if it turns out that the building did not have government approval, that does not automatically mean the building is substandard. These are mutually exclusive events. There is no reason whatsoever why the SCOAN would use substandard materials to erect a building. Secondly, if the building approval or whatever documentation were really necessary as is now hyped about, the regulatory body behind the said approval ought to have been present before now to require it from the SCOAN and sanction  the ministry then for not having it, not now  after the  building has collapsed they begin to  blurt allegations of “no approval”, After all, a regulatory body did visit the SCOAN to ask it to pay for the sign inscribed at the top of the SCOAN auditorium.

And finally to you TB Joshua; One would say now is the time for you to remember the Lords words:

“If the world hates you, you know that it has hated Me before it hated you. 19“If you were of the world, the world would love its own; but because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, because of this the world hates you.…John 15:18